What defines a traditionalistic political culture, according to Daniel Elazar?

A traditionalistic political culture, as defined by Daniel Elazar, emphasizes the role of government as a mechanism to maintain the existing social order, primarily benefiting the elite and preserving established hierarchies within society. In such cultures, political power is often concentrated in the hands of a few, and participation in the political process is typically limited to a select group who are seen as the rightful leaders. This perspective prioritizes stability and continuity over broad participation, which contrasts sharply with other political cultures that encourage active engagement and equal participation among citizens.

In traditionalistic cultures, the focus is less on policy-making through public engagement and more on maintaining the traditions and values that the elite control. This reflects a worldview that sees less value in widespread democratic participation and more in the influence of established social networks. The nature of governance here is less about collective action and more about the perpetuation of the current political status quo.